1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 953 F.2d
  5. 953 F.2d 1210 (1992)
 

MONROE v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS. CO.

No. 90-6240.

953 F.2d 1210 (1992)

Max MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 14, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Glen Mullins, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff-appellant.

Mary E. Mott (George D. Davis, with her on the brief) of McKinney, Stringer & Webster, P.C., Oklahoma City, Okl., for defendant-appellee.

Before EBEL and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and JENKINS, Chief District Judge.

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This is a diversity action wherein an insured brought suit against his insurer on certain health insurance policies. Max Monroe, a citizen and resident of Oklahoma, had three such policies with Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, a Nebraska corporation. Two of these policies contained the following language stamped in red ink on the front page of each policy: "Notice! Your Policy Carries An Elimination Endorsement." The third policy, apparently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases