1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 840 P.2d
  5. 840 P.2d 1270 (1992)
 

GADSCO, INC. v. TXO PRODUCTION CORP.

No. 76331.

840 P.2d 1270 (1992)

GADSCO, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation; Richard A. Tickle; Robert Q. Tickle; Robert L. Parker Trust; Elmer H. Lindquist; Don DeMoss; Scissortail Oil Co.; Guy B. Kiker Company; Guy B. Kiker; Oehl, Inc.; David R. Brown; Ann Noble Brown; Quien Sabe Corporation; E.E. Noble; Harry L. Brown, Jr.; Carol M. Brown; Romarco, Inc.; Jack E. Clark & Associates, Inc.; Kornfeld Petroleum Corp.; the Mary Dicey Trust # 2; the Mary Dicey Trust # 3; the Mary Dicey Trust # 4; the Bennie T. Estes Trust # 1; the Bennie T. Estes Trust # 2; Anoroco, Inc.; Shiloh Oil Corporation; Carlson Petroleum Company; F. Howard Walsh, Jr.; Kerr-McGee Corporation; Vince Allen Mu 80 Program Ltd.; Vince Allen Eta 78 Program Ltd.; Vince Allen & Associates; HFCO Coal Company; Shirley Huskins; Joseph F. Messenbaugh, III; North Custer Ltd. Partnership; John Muir Kipp; Jack Rich; Ogle Production Corp.; Clyde Hoeldtke, Jr. Trust; Kaiser-Francis Oil Company; Dasuma Corporation; G. William Ruppert; Susan Brown Ruppert; No-En-Co; Wm. Marbel Kipp, Trustee for the JEB Trust; Raymond Price; Lloyd Noble, II, Trustee of Lloyd Noble, II, Trust; David I. Greenberg; Rpr, Inc.; Mary Ellen Dinaburg; Indrex, Inc.; Texinia Corporation; Vinegarone, Inc.; Howard Shipley; Sio Company; Noarko 1983-1-A Operating, a Limited Partnership; Texas Energies, Inc.; Masters Energy Corp.; and Cobb Oil and Gas Company, Appellants, v. TXO PRODUCTION CORP., a Delaware Corporation, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division 3.

Rehearing Denied May 26, 1992.

Certiorari Denied November 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Fist, Mark S. Rains, Tulsa, for appellants.

Melinda J. Martin, Brian S. Gaskill, Kevin C. Leitch, Tulsa, for appellee.

Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

MEMORANDUM

JONES, Judge:

Appellants bring this appeal from the District Court's grant of summary judgment against the Appellants on the Appellant's motion. Several propositions of error were raised generally alleging the District Court erred by granting summary judgment in the face of controverted material facts and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases