IN RE GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION

No. 91-55500.

974 F.2d 1068 (1992)

In re GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 31, 1992.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carol C. Lam, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Frank Rothman and Richard E. Drooyan, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.


WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

The government appeals the denial of its motion for in camera review of allegedly privileged documents subpoenaed in a grand jury investigation. The district court had jurisdiction over the grand jury investigation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826 (1988). A timely notice of appeal was filed, and this court has jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 (1988) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988). We affirm the judgment of the district court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases