1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 806 F.Supp.
  5. 806 F.Supp. 1231 (1992)
 

HARTNETT v. SCHERING CORP.

Civ. No. L-90-2395.

806 F.Supp. 1231 (1992)

Mary D. HARTNETT, et al. v. SCHERING CORPORATION

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

October 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Verderaime, Baltimore, Md., and Peter M. Hartnett, Liverpool, N.Y., for plaintiffs.

George E. Golomb, Baltimore, Md., and Henry R. Simon, White Plains, N.Y., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

LEGG, District Judge.

In this products liability suit, the Court is called upon to decide cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs, Mary and Joseph Hartnett, and by defendant Schering Corporation ("Schering"). Invoking federal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity of citizenship), the Hartnetts seek compensatory and punitive damages from Schering based upon physical injuries that Mary Hartnett allegedly suffered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases