1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 794 F.Supp.
  5. 794 F.Supp. 1237 (1992)
 

MALARKEY v. TEXACO, INC.

No. 81 Civ. 5224 (MBM).

794 F.Supp. 1237 (1992)

Catherine E. MALARKEY, Plaintiff, v. TEXACO, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denny Chin, Ellen A. Harnick, Vladeck, Waldman, Elias & Engelhard, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff.

Paul M. Brown, Elizabeth A. Alcorn, Whitman & Ransom, New York City, for defendant.

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER

MUKASEY, District Judge.

After more than a decade of bitter litigation, plaintiff secured a jury verdict based on a finding that although defendant Texaco, Inc. did not discriminate against her on the basis of age, it did willfully retaliate against her for charging discrimination. The jury found damages in the amount of $65,000, which was then doubled to $130,000 based on the finding of willfulness. Now before the court is defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases