1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 792 F.Supp.
  5. 792 F.Supp. 1221 (1992)
 

RANDOLPH v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Civ. A. No. 91-AR-1541-S.

792 F.Supp. 1221 (1992)

Henry Harold RANDOLPH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, S.D.

June 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Edmund Odum, Jr., Clarence L. McDorman, Jr., Yearout Myers & Traylor P.C., Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs.

Thomas A. Robins, Edward S. Christenbury, Edwin Small, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tenn., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

The court has for consideration the motion of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), defendant in the above-entitled cause, for judgment on the pleadings. This motion is based on the contention that the statute of limitations bars the action. For the following reasons, the motion will be deferred for ruling for a period of ten (10) days on certain conditions to be set forth below.

Pertinent Facts

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases