1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 802 F.Supp.
  5. 802 F.Supp. 1169 (1992)
 

TELEBRANDS DIRECT RESPONSE v. OVATION COM.

Civ. A. No. 91-4388.

802 F.Supp. 1169 (1992)

TELEBRANDS DIRECT RESPONSE CORPORATION, a Virginia corporation, Plaintiff, v. OVATION COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a California corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

February 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sills Cummis Zuckerman Radin Tischman Epstein & Gross by Robert M. Axelrod, Newark, N.J., Cooper and Dunham by Thomas G. Carulli, New York City, for plaintiff.

Peckar & Abramson by Eugene Sullivan, River Edge, N.J., Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti by James R. Myers, Washington, D.C., for defendant.

OPINION

BISSELL, District Judge.

Telebrands Direct Response ("Telebrands"), a consumer products marketing company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia with headquarters in Wayne, New Jersey, initiated this action on October 3, 1991 with the filing of a declaratory judgment complaint. That complaint, which sought an injunction against any lawsuit brought by the defendant in jurisdictions outside the district of New Jersey, claimed that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases