1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 792 F.Supp.
  5. 792 F.Supp. 1106 (1992)
 

LULICH v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.

No. 89 C 1707.

792 F.Supp. 1106 (1992)

Donald P. LULICH, Plaintiff, v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

May 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard L. Rumsey, Anesi, Ozmon & Rodin, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

William D. Serritella, Raymond Hugo Groble, III, Ross & Hardies, P.C., Chicago, Ill., John A. Hiskes, Michael Jay Marovich, Buikema, Hiskes, Dillner, O'Donnell & Marovich Ltd., South Holland, Ill., Richard G. Howser, Clausen, Miller, Gorman, Caffrey & Witous, P.C., Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant Sherwin-Williams Company's ("Sherwin-Williams") motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

FACTS

The plaintiff, Donald P. Lulich ("Lulich"), was employed by Fred P. Berglund & Sons, Inc. ("Berglund").1 In May 1987, Sherwin-Williams contracted with Berglund to build a boiler house on Sherwin-Williams's industrial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases