1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 64 Ohio
  5. 64 Ohio St.3d 123 (1992)
 

OFFICE OF CONSUMERS' COUNSEL v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

No. 91-823.

64 Ohio St.3d 123 (1992)

OFFICE OF CONSUMERS' COUNSEL, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 1, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Spratley, Consumers' Counsel, Evelyn R. Robinson-McGriff, Richard W. Pace, Sr., and Thomas C. Kawalec, for appellant.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, James B. Gainer and Anne L. Hammerstein, for appellee.

Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Alan P. Buchmann, David H. Wallace and Debra J. Horn, for intervening appellee.

Per Curiam.

A

Stipulation

OCC contends that the evidence does not support the stipulation and that any stipulation not supported by substantial evidence is unlawful. The commission and CG & E maintain that sufficient evidence supports the stipulation and, consequently, the commission's order.

In Akron v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1978), 55 Ohio St.2d 155, 157, 9 O.O.3d 122, 123, 378...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases