1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 780 F.Supp.
  5. 780 F.Supp. 1025 (1992)
 

BROWN v. ENZYME DEV. DIV. OF BIDDLE SAWYER, CORP.

No. 91 Civ. 6945 (WK).

780 F.Supp. 1025 (1992)

Sandra BROWN, Plaintiff, v. ENZYME DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF BIDDLE SAWYER CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 22, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandra Brown, pro se.

Christine B. Cesare, Emmet, Marvin & Martin, New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

WHITMAN KNAPP, Senior District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss pro se plaintiff's Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., action against it on the grounds that she filed her complaint after the 90-day filing period had passed. Before us also is plaintiff's application for appointment of counsel.

Plaintiff acknowledged in her complaint that she received on June 21, 1991 the EEOC's "Determination" letter informing her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases