1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 835 P.2d
  5. 835 P.2d 951 (1992)
 

McDONALD v. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS

88-04585; CA A67378.

835 P.2d 951 (1992)

114 Or. App. 486

In the Matter of the Compensation of Robert W. McDonald, Claimant. Robert W. McDONALD, Petitioner, v. ROSEBURG FOREST PRODUCTS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karsten H. Rasmussen, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Rasmussen & Henry, Eugene.

Adam T. Stamper, Medford, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cowling & Heysell, Medford.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.

DEITS, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (Board) denying his aggravation claim. We affirm.

Claimant suffered compensable injuries to his back in 1984, 1985 and 1987. The claims were closed by a determination order issued in February, 1988, and reopened in June, 1988, when claimant underwent surgery. He returned to work in December, 1988. On January 9, 1989, Dr. Hebert reported that claimant was experiencing a "flare...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases