1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 793 F.Supp.
  5. 793 F.Supp. 930 (1992)
 

BERG v. LEASON

No. C 92-20283 JW.

793 F.Supp. 930 (1992)

Carl E. BERG, Plaintiff, v. Hayden LEASON, an individual; Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, a partnership including professional corporations; Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, a California law corporation; Paul Alexander, an individual; Stephen V. Bomse, an individual; Spencer Hosie, an individual; Stuart C. Clark, an individual; Stanley Young, an individual; and Does One through Ten, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division.

July 1, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amy L. Freisleben, Gabriel, Herman & Peretz, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Jan Nielsen Little, Keker, Brockett, & Van Nest, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

WARE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Carl E. Berg moves to remand this action to state court for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. Moreover, Defendants Hayden Leason, et al., move to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint, contending it is time barred by the statute of limitations. Additionally...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases