1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 783 F.Supp.
  5. 783 F.Supp. 893 (1992)
 

THOMPSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON MAN. INFO.

Civ. No. 86-319.

783 F.Supp. 893 (1992)

Richard THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON MANAGEMENT INFORMATION CENTER, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

As Amended February 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur N. Martin, Jr., by Michelle Marquez, Newark, N.J., for plaintiff.

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue by James E. Farrell, Jr., New York City, for defendant.

OPINION

CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.

This case involves the hotly debated question of whether the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Pub.L. No. 102-166, 105 Stat. 1071 (1991) ("1991 Act"), applies to cases that were pending at the time of its enactment. For the reasons set forth below, this court holds that the Act does not. As a result, plaintiff's motion to reinstate a claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 is denied.

Plaintiff commenced this action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases