1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 801 F.Supp.
  5. 801 F.Supp. 867 (1992)
 

WILLIAMS v. POULOS

Civ. No. 92-0069-B.

801 F.Supp. 867 (1992)

George WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, Ralph Dyer, Intervener, v. Richard POULOS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Maine.

September 3, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Whitman, Richardson & Troubh, Portland, Me. and Allen S. Rugg, Kutak, Rock & Campbell, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

E. Stephen Murray, Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, Me., for intervenor-plaintiff Dyer.

John A. McArdle, III, Daniel G. Lilley Law Offices, Portland, Me., for defendants Bowers, Rodrigue and Robichaud.

Peter T. Marchesi, Wheeler & Arey, P.A., Waterville, Me., for defendants Leighton and Probe.

Peter J. Detroy, III, Norman, Hanson & Detroy, Portland, Me., for defendants Poulos and Campbell, Poulos, Campbell & Zendzian.

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

BRODY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' and Intervener's motions for a preliminary injunction. The Plaintiffs and Intervener allege that the Defendants intercepted and recorded telephone conversations in violation of federal and state law. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 and 15 M.R.S.A. §§ 709-713. The Plaintiffs and Intervener request that the Defendants be preliminarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases