1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 784 F.Supp.
  5. 784 F.Supp. 882 (1992)
 

BUTCHKOSKY v. ENSTROM HELICOPTER CORP.

No. 91-10007-CIV.

784 F.Supp. 882 (1992)

Alex BUTCHKOSKY, and All Air, Inc., a Florida corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ENSTROM HELICOPTER CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and William R. Ciszewski, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida.

February 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc David Sarnoff, Sarnoff & Bayer, Coconut Grove, Fla., Leon Margules, Entin, Schwartz, Goldman, Margules & Moore, Miami, Fla., for plaintiffs Alex Butchkosky and All Air, Inc..

Arthur C. Moller, III, Miami, Fla., for defendant Enstrom Helicopter Corp.

James W. Jarvis, Jarvis, Roffino & Villasante, Coral Gables, Fla., for defendant William R. Ciszewski.

ORDER DENYING ENSTROM'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.

This cause comes before the Court upon the motion for partial summary judgment of defendant Enstrom Helicopter Corporation ("Enstrom"), pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff All Air, Inc. ("All Air") filed a response, Enstrom a reply, and All Air a supplemental memorandum. Enstrom argues that summary judgment should be granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases