1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 825 P.2d
  5. 825 P.2d 657 (1992)
 

BARTZ v. STATE OF OREGON

90-CV-0091-TM; CA A67398.

825 P.2d 657 (1992)

111 Or.App. 614

Russell B. BARTZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 15, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied February 19, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven K. Chappell, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief, for appellant.

Timothy A. Sylwester, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Petitioner's petition for post-conviction relief was dismissed on the ground that it was not timely filed. He appeals on two grounds. First, he contends that he was excused from filing his petition within the 120-day limitation period in the Post-Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA). He also contends that imposing a limitation period denies him due process and impermissibly suspends the writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

Petitioner was charged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases