1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 785 F.Supp.
  5. 785 F.Supp. 695 (1992)
 

OCKERMAN v. MAY ZIMA & CO.

No. 3:85-1190.

785 F.Supp. 695 (1992)

Frank M. OCKERMAN, individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated, v. MAY ZIMA & CO., et al.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division.

January 7, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Wagster, Hollins, Wagster & Yarbrough, Nashville, Tenn., Richard H. Adams, Anthony Robert, Richard O. Conner, Jr., Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff.

Michael L. Dagley, Farris, Warfield & Kanaday, Nashville, Tenn., Mary K. Simpson, Thomas J. Guilday, J. Stephen Menton, Huey, Guilday, Kuersteiner & Tucker, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM

JOHN T. NIXON, Chief Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above styled action is defendant May Zima & Co.'s (May Zima) motion for summary judgment on the issues of plaintiffs' fraud created the market theory, plaintiffs' aiding and abetting and conspiracy theories as applied to May Zima, and the statute of limitations issue.

I. BACKGROUND

After substantial discovery, the facts pertinent to the resolution of the issues today...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases