1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 838 P.2d
  5. 838 P.2d 637 (1992)
 

CARLSON v. VALLEY MECHANICAL

90-09177; CA A69753.

838 P.2d 637 (1992)

115 Or. App. 371

In the Matter of the Compensation of Herman M. Carlson, Claimant. Herman M. CARLSON, Petitioner, v. VALLEY MECHANICAL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 30, 1992.

Reconsideration Denied December 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward H. Harri, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Stanley F. Fields and the Law Office of Michael B. Dye, Salem.

Jerald P. Keene, Portland, waived oral argument for respondent. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinisch, Mackenzie, Healey & Wilson, P.C., Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

DE MUNIZ, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that denied his aggravation claim. We affirm.

Claimant was injured in 1984. His aggravation rights expired on December 10, 1989. On November 15, 1989, his employer received chart notes from his chiropractor. Employer treated the notes as a claim for aggravation, which it denied.

On April 30, 1990, claimant requested a hearing on the denial. The hearing was convened on July...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases