1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 603 N.E.2d
  5. 603 N.E.2d 867 (1992)
 

BOOSTROM v. BACH

No. 82A04-9008-CV-372.

603 N.E.2d 867 (1992)

Rebecca BOOSTROM, Appellant-Plaintiff, v. Stephen BACH, Appellee-Defendant.

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.

November 23, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rebecca Boostrom, pro se appellant.

Stephen Bach, Bach Law Offices, pro se appellee.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

CHEZEM, Judge.

Defendant-Appellee, Stephen Bach ("Bach"), contends that we erred in our published opinion reversing the trial court's entry of summary judgment granted in his favor. See, Boostrom v. Bach (1992), Ind. App., 589 N.E.2d 275. In particular, he argues that statutory law requires prepayment of filing fees in small claims cases; that there was no competent or admissible evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases