1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 792 F.Supp.
  5. 792 F.Supp. 605 (1992)
 

AMOAKOHENE v. BOBKO

No. 91 C 689.

792 F.Supp. 605 (1992)

Fred AMOAKOHENE and Adu Opoku, Plaintiffs, v. Michael BOBKO, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

June 10, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Garnet Fay, Daniel E. Murphy, O'Brien, Hanrahan, Wojcik & Fay, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Linda A. Wawzenski, U.S. Atty's. Office, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

Before the court is the motion of plaintiffs, Fred Amoakohene and Adu Opoku (collectively "plaintiffs"), to reconsider this court's order of July 23, 1991 dismissing Count I, dismissing defendant City of Chicago ("the City") from Count II and substituting the United States as a defendant in Count II for the individual defendants. On or about August 15, 1991, this court referred plaintiffs' motion pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases