1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 834 P.2d
  5. 834 P.2d 519 (1992)
 

FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE v. STATE

UP-117-89; CA A69143.

834 P.2d 519 (1992)

114 Or. App. 214

FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Respondent, v. STATE of Oregon, CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 8, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harrison Latto, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Daryl S. Garrettson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William J. Gibbons and Aitchison, Hoag, Vick & Tarantino, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Oregon State Department of Corrections (Department) seeks judicial review of final order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). ERB determined that Department had committed an unfair labor practice, ORS 243.672(1)(e), when it refused to bargain with the Federation of Oregon Parole and Probation Officers, the collective bargaining representative of Department's employees, before requiring an employee to submit to a drug test.

ERB relied on our...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases