1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 782 F.Supp.
  5. 782 F.Supp. 397 (1992)
 

CHILDRESS v. ARCATA GRAPHICS CO.

No. 90 C 6530.

782 F.Supp. 397 (1992)

Ernest A. CHILDRESS, Plaintiff, v. ARCATA GRAPHICS COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

January 22, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilfred F. Rice, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Michael C. Hallerud, Bernadette M. Davison, Pettit & Martin, San Francisco, Cal., Julie Hart, Matkov, Salzman, Madoff & Gunn, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Ernest Childress ("Childress") claims that Arcata Graphics Company ("Arcata") fired him because of his age (47 at the time of his dismissal), in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act ("ADEA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. Arcata now moves for a summary judgment in its favor under Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 56. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, its motion is granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases