1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 790 F.Supp.
  5. 790 F.Supp. 383 (1992)
 

ARMOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. FREEDMAN

Civ. A. No. H-88-497 (JAC).

790 F.Supp. 383 (1992)

ARMOTEK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. Seymour FREEDMAN, et al.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

March 13, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann McClure, Day, Berry & Howard, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff.

Jeffrey R. Martin, Marie A. Casper, Brenner, Saltzman, Wallman & Goldman, New Haven, Conn., for defendants Seymour Freedman, Helene Freedman and S. Freedman, Inc.

RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:

Pending before the court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (filed Sept. 12, 1991) of defendants Seymour Freedman, Helene Freedman and S. Freedman Electric, Inc., which was submitted for decision after oral argument on January 29, 1992.

Background

Defendants Seymour Freedman and Helene Freedman are officers and directors of S. Freedman Electric...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases