1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 798 F.Supp.
  5. 798 F.Supp. 367 (1992)
 

ARTHUR v. E.I. du PONT

Civ. A. No. 2:92-0682.

798 F.Supp. 367 (1992)

Constance E. ARTHUR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. E.I. du PONT, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Charleston Division.

September 17, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David S. Skeen, Preiser Law Offices, South Charleston, William E. Murray, Mitchell & Murray, Charleston, W.Va., for plaintiffs.

Eric M. James, David B. Thomas, Charles L. Woody, Spilman, Thomas, Battle & Klostermeyer, Charleston, W.Va., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is the Plaintiffs' motion to remand this action to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County, West Virginia (the circuit court). For reasons set out more fully below, the Plaintiffs' motion is hereby GRANTED.

The Plaintiffs claim that the Defendant DuPont deliberately and intentionally exposed Ms. Arthur to hazardous chemicals. The claim is based in part upon W.Va.Code § 23-4-2 (Supp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases