1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 797 F.Supp.
  5. 797 F.Supp. 363 (1992)
 

NORTH RIVER INS. v. PHILADELPHIA REINSURANCE

Civ. A. No. 91-1323.

797 F.Supp. 363 (1992)

The NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PHILADELPHIA REINSURANCE CORPORATION and Cigna Reinsurance Company, individually and as successor to INA Reinsurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

As Amended August 12, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis G. Jacobs, Brian G. Snover, Robert R. Pollowitz, Simpson, Thatcher & Bartlett, New York City, for plaintiff.

Thomas A. Allen, Ellen K. Burrows, Julia M. Melendez, White & Williams, Westmont, N.J., for defendant CIGNA Reinsurance.

Paul Kanefsky, Buchalter, Nemer, Fields & Younger, New York City, for defendant Philadelphia Reinsurance.

OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

This is an appeal by CIGNA Reinsurance Company ("CIGNA Re") pursuant to Rule 40D4(a) of the General Rules of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. CIGNA Re seeks reversal of that part of the Opinion and Order of Magistrate Judge Pisano filed April 6, 1992, by which Judge Pisano denied CIGNA Re's motion to compel discovery of attorney-client documents created in connection with Alternative Dispute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases