1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 838 S.W.2d
  5. 838 S.W.2d 317 (1992)
 

INGRAM EXPLORATION v. WILD WELL CONTROL

No. 08-91-00264-CV.

838 S.W.2d 317 (1992)

INGRAM EXPLORATION COMPANY, Appellant, v. WILD WELL CONTROL, INC. and Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso.

Rehearing Overruled October 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Cooney, Jr., Brock C. Akers, Martin J. de la Torre, Phillips & Akers Houston, for appellant.

Stuart J. Starry, Beirne, Maynard & Parsons, Hon. Randall W. Morse, McGettigan, Morse & Gill, Kevin M. Feeney, Houston, for appellees.

Before OSBORN, C.J., and KOEHLER and LARSEN, JJ.

OPINION

OSBORN, Chief Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of an indemnity agreement between an oil and fwgas exploration company and an oil well service company specializing in well control operations. The trial court awarded recovery for attorney's fees and other expenses incurred in defending a third-party claim which arose from loss of a well being drilled by the exploration company. We reverse and render.

Facts

Ingram...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases