1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 794 F.Supp.
  5. 794 F.Supp. 346 (1992)
 

LUNDY v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO.

No. C 90-2796 BAC.

794 F.Supp. 346 (1992)

James M. LUNDY, et al., Plaintiff, v. MORGAN STANLEY & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 29, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Heimann, Daniel C. Girard, William M. Audet, Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

John N. Hauser, Charmaine F. Mesina, McCutcheon, Doyle, Brown & Enerson, San Francisco, Cal., James W.B. Benkard, Stephen D. Hibbard, Frederick R. Kessler, Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York City, for defendant.

ORDER

CAULFIELD, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff's motion to reinstate its Section 10(b) claims. Upon consideration of the briefs and arguments of the parties, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.

BACKGROUND

The plaintiff class in this matter filed this action stating several claims under Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases