1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 795 F.Supp.
  5. 795 F.Supp. 343 (1992)
 

SIDCO INDUSTRIES INC. v. WIMAR TAHOE CORP.

Civ. No. 91-110-FR.

795 F.Supp. 343 (1992)

SIDCO INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. WIMAR TAHOE CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

June 5, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Pierre Kolisch, Peter E. Heuser, Kolisch, Hartwell, Dickinson, McCormack & Heuser, Portland, Or., for plaintiff.

Steven K. Blackhurst, Jeffrey J. Baker, Ater, Wynne, Hewitt, Dodson & Skerritt, Portland, Or., J. Robert Chambers, Gregory J. Lunn, Wood, Herron & Evans, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.

OPINION

FRYE, Judge:

This is an action for service mark infringement and false designation of origin brought by plaintiff, Sidco Industries Incorporated (Sidco), against defendant, Wimar Tahoe Corporation (Wimar). The matter before the court is the motion (# 51) of Wimar for summary judgment as to Counts I, II and III of Sidco's amended complaint.

UNDISPUTED FACTS

Sidco, an Oregon corporation, owns and operates the Horizon Motor Inn in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases