1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 797 F.Supp.
  5. 797 F.Supp. 329 (1992)
 

IMAGINEERING, INC. v. VAN KLASSENS, INC.

No. 92 Civ. 751 (RLC).

797 F.Supp. 329 (1992)

IMAGINEERING, INC., Plaintiff, v. VAN KLASSENS, INC. and Robert Lukingbeal, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

September 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heslin & Rothenberg, P.C., Albany, N.Y. (Susan F. Gullotti, Nicholas Mesiti, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Robinson Brog Leinwand Reich Genovese & Gluck, P.C., New York City (David C. Burger, of counsel), Pitts & Brittian, Knoxville, Tenn., for defendants.

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Imagineering, Inc., brings this action against defendants Van Klassens, Inc. and Robert Lukingbeal, alleging claims for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271, for unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and alleging pendent state claims for unfair competition and dilution. Defendants have moved, under Rules 12(b)(2) and 12(b)(3), F.R.Civ.P., to dismiss this action for lack of personal jurisdiction and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases