1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 791 F.Supp.
  5. 791 F.Supp. 321 (1992)
 

THOMAS v. LUJAN

Civ. A. No. 92-537 (CRR).

791 F.Supp. 321 (1992)

William THOMAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Manuel LUJAN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

June 4, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William and Ellen Thomas, pro se.

Thomas Beckett of Klimaski, Miller & Smith, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., District of Columbia, John Bates, and John Munich, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs request this Court to reconsider its May 5, 1992 Order which dismissed the above-captioned case on the merits pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(a). Although Plaintiffs do not present any new evidence, Plaintiffs contend that the Court erred as a matter of law in dismissing their First Amendment and Administrative Procedure Act claims.1 Upon further review of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases