1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 830 F.Supp.
  5. 830 F.Supp. 274 (1992)
 

MARRS v. MARRIOTT CORP.

Civ. A. No. WN-91-1921.

830 F.Supp. 274 (1992)

Timothy H. MARRS v. MARRIOTT CORPORATION, et al.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

December 21, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel M. Wemhoff, Washington, DC, for plaintiff.

Gary L. Simpler, and Shawe & Rosenthal, Baltimore, MD, for defendant Timothy Spicer.

Anna Mary Coburn, and Michael C. Ford, of Bethesda, MD, for defendants Marriott Corp., John E. Gamble and John Biemeck.

MEMORANDUM

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 16). Plaintiff has filed an Opposition (Paper No. 20)1 and Defendants have replied (Paper No. 22). Upon a review of the motion and the applicable caselaw, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendants' motion should be granted in part and denied in part.

I....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases