1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 9 Cal.App.4th
  5. 9 Cal.App.4th 1053 (1992)
 

WELLS PROPERTIES v. POPKIN

Docket No. G011664.

9 Cal.App.4th 1053 (1992)

11 Cal. Rptr.2d 845

WELLS PROPERTIES et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. RICHARD POPKIN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

September 16, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rich & Ezer and Mitchel J. Ezer for Defendants and Appellants.

Walker, Kendrick & Jackson, Allan P. Leguay, Schmiesing & Blied, Timothy J. Blied and Kenneth W. Nickel for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

MOORE, J.

Richard Popkin, Ruth Shamir and Jack Golan (Popkin) appeal from an order denying their motion to impose sanctions as prescribed by Code of Civil Procedure section 128.51 against Wells Properties and its attorneys, Schmiesing & Blied (Wells).

FACTS

Popkin and Wells settled an action seeking an unpaid real estate commission. Under the terms of the agreement, Popkin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases