1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 789 F.Supp.
  5. 789 F.Supp. 257 (1992)
 

SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO. v. WILLIAM G. SMART CO., INC.

No. 91 C 1049.

789 F.Supp. 257 (1992)

SPRAYING SYSTEMS CO., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM G. SMART COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

March 20, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marc D. Janser, Pedersen & Houpt, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Francis X. King, Law Offices of Francis X. King, P.C., Grosse Point Woods, Mich., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

On January 3, 1992 this Court, in an oral bench ruling, denied what plaintiff Spraying Systems Co. ("Spraying Systems") had characterized as a Fed.R.Civ.P. ("Rule") 56 motion for summary judgment.1 In the course of that denial, this Court held that witnesses Robert Mueller and George Worthington were not rendered incompetent to testify for then defendant William Smart...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases