1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 791 F.Supp.
  5. 791 F.Supp. 248 (1992)
 

STILL v. MICHAELS

No. CIV 91-237-TUC-RMB.

791 F.Supp. 248 (1992)

Arthur R. STILL and Beatrice Still, husband and wife, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph MICHAELS, III, and Miriam R. Michaels, husband and wife, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona, Tucson Division.

March 11, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George R. Roylston, Roylston & Roylston, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs.

Bruce L. Dusenberry, Gust Rosenfeld, Tucson, Ariz., for defendants.

ORDER

BILBY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Arthur B. Still and Beatrice Still, husband and wife, bring this action for nuisance as a result of Defendants' use of a radio transmitter ("ham" radio). Named as Defendants are Joseph Michaels, III and Miriam R. Michaels, husband and wife, and the Federal Communications Commission. Upon motion of Plaintiffs, the FCC was dismissed from this action. See Still v. Michaels, CIV-90-237-TUC-RMB (D.Ariz. Jan. 15,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases