1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 793 F.Supp.
  5. 793 F.Supp. 228 (1992)
 

WHITMAN v. SCHLUMBERGER LTD.

No. C 92-20150 JW.

793 F.Supp. 228 (1992)

Paul WHITMAN, Plaintiff, v. SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED, a corporation, Schlumberger Technologies, and Does 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 24, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mitchell Green, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Douglas W. Phillips, Morrison & Foerster, Palo Alto, Cal., for defendants.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

WARE, District Judge.

Defendant Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. ("STI") moves pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action, retaliation in violation of public policy, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendant's motion to dismiss raises the question of what constitutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases