1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 756 F.Supp.
  5. 756 F.Supp. 233 (1991)
 

U.S. v. HIPKINS

Crim. No. S-90-0453.

756 F.Supp. 233 (1991)

UNITED STATES of America v. Conrad HIPKINS and Automated Sciences Group, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

February 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Breckinridge L. Willcox, U.S. Atty., Dale P. Kelberman, William K. Meyer, Asst. U.S. Attys., Baltimore, Md., for U.S.

Michael Schatzow, Catherine L. Schuster, Venable, Baetjer & Howard, Baltimore, Md., Jacob A. Stein, Stein, Mitchell & Mezines, Washington, D.C., for defendant Conrad Hipkins.

James J. Graham, Jones, Day, Reavis & Rogue, Washington, D.C., for defendant Automated Sciences Group, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMALKIN, District Judge.

In a four-count indictment, defendants have been charged with conspiring with Richard Ramirez, a former civilian employee of the Navy (Count I), bribing Mr. Ramirez in return for favorable treatment regarding certain Navy contracts (Counts II and III), and using a facility in interstate commerce with the intent to commit bribery (Count IV). Defendants now move to dismiss the entire indictment against them, based...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases