WARD v. MUSTOLA

88-12202; CA A65570.

808 P.2d 109 (1991)

106 Or. App. 484

In the Matter of the Compensation of Jimmie C. Ward, Claimant. Jimmie C. WARD, Petitioner, v. John A. MUSTOLA and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 3, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary L. Tyler, Portland, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the brief, was Galton, Scott & Colett, Portland.

John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and ROSSMAN and DE MUNIZ, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order affirming the referee's decision that he is not permanently and totally disabled. Claimant contends that the Board's order is inadequate for judicial review, because it does not contain findings sufficient to support its conclusion, and that the findings that the Board made are not supported by substantial evidence.

We agree that, in the light of the voluminous record and the conflicting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases