1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 767 F.Supp.
  5. 767 F.Supp. 94 (1991)
 

NIKLAUS v. VIVADENT, INC., U.S.A.

No. 4:CV-87-1760.

767 F.Supp. 94 (1991)

Ronald W. NIKLAUS, D.D.S., and Mary Niklaus, Plaintiffs, v. VIVADENT, INC., U.S.A., Patterson Dental Supply Co., and Vivadent Liechtenstein, Defendants.

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania.

July 11, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Youngman, Jr., Allen E. Ertel, Williamsport, Pa., for plaintiffs.

John E. Person, III, Cynthia E. Ranck, Williamsport, Pa., for defendants Vivadent, Inc., U.S.A. and Vivadent Liechtenstein.

Jonathan E. Butterfield, Williamsport, Pa., for defendant Patterson Dental Supply Co.

MEMORANDUM

McCLURE, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a diversity action commenced by Plaintiffs on December 18, 1987. The complaint alleges that a dental resin curing light known as the "Heliomat" which is distributed and/or sold by the defendants and used in the dental practice of Plaintiff, Dr. Ronald W. Niklaus, caused eye damage to Dr. Niklaus. Plaintiffs assert claims in strict liability, breach of warranty, negligence and loss of consortium...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases