1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 498 U.S.
  5. 498 U.S. 358 (1991)
 

TRINOVA CORP. v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF TREASURY

No. 89-1106.

498 U.S. 358 (1991)

111 S.Ct. 818

112 L.Ed.2d 884

TRINOVA CORP. v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 19, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter S. Sheldon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Thomas D. Hammerschmidt, Jr., Jeffery V. Stuckey, Benjamin O. Schwendener, Jr., William F. Sheehan, Collette C. Goodman, and Walter Hellerstein.

Richard R. Roesch, Assistant Attorney General of Michigan, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Gay Secor Hardy, Solicitor General, and Thomas L. Casey, Assistant Solicitor General.*

JUSTICE KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court.

The principal question before us is whether the three-factor apportionment formula of the Michigan single business tax (SBT), Mich. Comp. Laws § 208.1 et seq. (1979), violates either the Due Process Clause or the Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution. The applicability of a three-factor formula to a state income tax is well settled, but we have not considered whether a similar apportionment formula...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases