1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 528 Pa.
  5. 528 Pa. 320 (1991)
 

LOVE v. BOROUGH OF STROUDSBURG

528 Pa. 320 (1991)

597 A.2d 1137

Mark S. LOVE, Appellant, v. BOROUGH OF STROUDSBURG, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided October 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark S. Love, pro se.

Ralph A. Matergia, Stroudsburg, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and CAPPY, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAPPY*, Justice.

The issues presented in this appeal are, whether a borough ordinance creating a restrictive residential parking scheme is a valid exercise of police power; and whether the ordinance, if valid under the police power, violates the equal protection provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution. For the reasons that follow we find the ordinance withstands...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases