1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 246 N.J.
  5. 246 N.J. Super. 597 (1991)
 

STATE v. ROBERSON

246 N.J. Super. 597 (1991)

588 A.2d 434

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DONALD F. ROBERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 22, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William B. Smith, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Wilfredo Caraballo, Public Defender, attorney; William B. Smith, of counsel and on the brief).

James E. Jones, Jr., Deputy Attorney General argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; James E. Jones, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, BRODY and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BRODY, J.A.D.

We now hold that the Legislature did not unconstitutionally invade the domain of the Supreme Court by enacting N.J.S.A. 2C:35-19, which establishes a pretrial procedure for rendering admissible the results of a chemical analysis of suspected controlled dangerous substances.

Following a jury trial defendant was convicted of second-degree unlawful...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases