1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 323 Md.
  5. 323 Md. 514 (1991)
 

R & T CONSTRUCTION v. JUDGE

No. 97 September Term, 1990.

323 Md. 514 (1991)

594 A.2d 99

R & T CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ET AL. v. THOMAS CLAUDE JUDGE.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Motion for Reconsideration Denied October 4, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald S. Canter (Wolpoff and Abramson, both on brief), Bethesda, for respondent.

Stan M. Haynes and Rudolph L. Rose, Baltimore (Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, John Noble, Noble and Crow, P.A., Rockville, all on brief), for petitioners.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE and CHASANOW, JJ., and CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr. and MARVIN H. SMITH, Associate Judges of the Court of Appeals (retired), Specially Assigned.

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This workers' compensation case concerns the scope of an employer's obligation to provide medical treatment and services under Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol.), Art. 101, § 37(a). The principal issues are whether the complainant, a quadriplegic, is entitled to a specially equipped van, to additional remodeling and enlarging of his residence, and to the cost of electricity consumed in powering certain appliances used by him. The Workmen's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases