1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 245 N.J.
  5. 245 N.J. Super. 591 (1991)
 

ESDAILE v. HARTSFIELD

245 N.J. Super. 591 (1991)

586 A.2d 334

LAVERNE ESDAILE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. WINZEL HARTSFIELD, DEFENDANT, AND HAZEL FRANK GLUCK, ON BEHALF OF THE UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Mirra argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Boglioli & O'Mara, attorneys; William Pfister, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).

Stanley S. Spector argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant (Shechet & Spector, attorneys; Stanley S. Spector, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges MICHELS, GRUCCIO and D'ANNUNZIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Hazel Frank Gluck, on behalf of the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board ("Fund"), appeals from a judgment of the Law Division that awarded plaintiff Laverne Esdaile attorneys' fees and costs of $13,362.05. Plaintiff cross-appeals from that portion of the judgment which ordered her to reimburse the Fund the $26,724.11 that she received in settlement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases