1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 757 F.Supp.
  5. 757 F.Supp. 72 (1991)
 

CITY OF NEW YORK v. WATKINS

Civ. A. No. 89-2335-LFO.

757 F.Supp. 72 (1991)

CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. James D. WATKINS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

February 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Shaffer, Mary E. Cassidy, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., and Victor A. Kovner, Corp. Counsel of the City of New York, New York City, for plaintiff.

Thomas Millet, Judry L. Subar, Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., and Stephen C. Skubel, Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

OBERDORFER, District Judge.

In May 1986, two New York City agencies, the Departments of Sanitation and Environmental Protection, applied for restitution for petroleum overcharges from an escrow fund created by an order issued in what is known as the "Stripper Well Litigation." See, e.g., In re Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation, 690 F.2d 1375, 1377-80 (Temp.Emer.Ct. App.1982); the Departments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases