1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 764 F.Supp.
  5. 764 F.Supp. 52 (1991)
 

INSTA-BULK, INC. v. POWERTEX INC.

No. 82 Civ. 1180(MEL).

764 F.Supp. 52 (1991)

INSTA-BULK, INC., Plaintiff, v. POWERTEX INC., Successor in Interest to: Tri-Wall Containers, Defendant, and Sea-Land Service, Inc., Defendant/Intervenor.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

As Corrected June 7, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn by Steven E. Obus, New York City, Arnold, White & Durkee by Alan H. Gordon, Gordon G. Waggett, Robert W. Craft, Jr., Houston, Tex., for Insta-Bulk, Inc.

Kenneth L. King, John S. Sensny, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, Garden City, N.Y., Jeffrey L. Reiner, Geralyn A. Boccher, Meyner and Landis, Newark, N.J., for Powertex, Inc.

LASKER, District Judge.

Powertex, Inc. moves to hold Insta-Bulk, Inc., in contempt of an injunction filed in this court on June 17, 1983. Because the matter is urgent to both parties, a summary disposition is in order.

Powertex alleges that Insta-Bulk has violated the injunction by making sales of its products in violation of Powertex's patent on the products. This matter originated in the court in 1982. A settlement agreement was entered into contemporaneously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases