1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 760 F.Supp.
  5. 760 F.Supp. 51 (1991)
 

LUND v. CHEMICAL BANK

No. 84 Civ. 1621 (RWS).

760 F.Supp. 51 (1991)

Russell T. LUND, Jr., Lund's, Inc., and Wardwell M. Montgomery, Plaintiffs, v. CHEMICAL BANK, Defendant. CHEMICAL BANK, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. LAIDLAW ADAMS & PECK, INC., Third-Party Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 27, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorsey & Whitney by James R. Kahn, of counsel, New York City, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. by Ted S. Meikle, and F. Chet Taylor, of counsel, Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff Lund's, Inc.

Chemical Bank by Barbara E. Daniele, and James L. Condren, of counsel, New York City, for defendant Chemical Bank.

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Chemical Bank ("Chemical") has moved pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for entry of judgment in its favor in accordance with the opinion dated February 16, 1990, which granted its motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Lund's, Inc. ("LI") has renewed its motion for reconsideration of the February 16 opinion. For the following reasons, the motion for reconsideration is granted and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases