1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 526 Pa.
  5. 526 Pa. 199 (1991)
 

COM. v. HASHEM

526 Pa. 199 (1991)

584 A.2d 1378

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Thomas HASHEM, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided January 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert T. Gownley, Jr., Scranton, for appellant.

David M. McGlaughlin, Philadelphia, for amicus — National Assoc. of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Dist. Atty., Ronald W. Costen, Harrisburg, for appellee.

Andrea F. McKenna, Deputy Atty. Gen., LeRoy S. Zimmerman, Atty. Gen., as amicus.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA, PAPADAKOS and STOUT, JJ.

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur in the present case to determine, as a question of first impression, the specific requirements governing the use of information intercepted under the provisions of the Wiretap Act, 18 Pa.C.S. § 5701 et seq., when the crime alleged is different from the targeted criminal activity that formed the basis for the original intercept order. Upon the facts of record and for the reasons following, we are constrained...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases