1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 252 N.J.
  5. 252 N.J. Super. 401 (1991)
 

ROYAL BRADLEY v. BRADLEY BEACH BOR.

252 N.J. Super. 401 (1991)

599 A.2d 1288

ROYAL BRADLEY ASSOCIATES, THOMAS AND DORIS NIEGLOS, JAMES AND THERESA HOLLYWOOD, AND ALICE L. GLOSGOLD, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BRADLEY BEACH BOROUGH, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael I. Schneck argued the cause for appellants (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein, Hammer & Gladstone, attorneys; Michael I. Schneck of counsel, Michael I. Schneck and David L. Wecht on the brief).

Lawrence R. Jones argued the cause for respondent (Keith, Winters & Wenning, attorneys; Lawrence R. Jones on the letter brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, BILDER and KEEFE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.H., P.J.A.D.

The issue raised in this appeal is whether the Tax Court has jurisdiction to hear the merits of an appeal when the petition to the county board of taxation was not filed within the time prescribed by statute. Plaintiffs appeal from a dismissal of their complaint by the Tax Court which found that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the merits because the appeal had not been filed with the Monmouth County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases