1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 168 Ariz.
  5. 168 Ariz. 448 (1991)
 

MATTER OF NICOLINI

No. SB-91-0030-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 88-1141, 88-1404, 88-1712, 88-1765 and 88-1912.

168 Ariz. 448 (1991)

814 P.2d 1385

In the Matter of a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Daniel Armando NICOLINI, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

August 6, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Snell & Wilmer by William T. Tinney, Tucson, for respondent.

State Bar of Arizona by Harriet L. Turney, Chief Bar Counsel and Yigael M. Cohen, Staff Bar Counsel, Phoenix, for State Bar.

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

The State Bar of Arizona (Bar) submitted this matter for review on the record. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S.Sup.Ct.Rules, rule 53(e).

II. QUESTION PRESENTED

Daniel Armando Nicolini (respondent) and Bar Counsel accepted the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission). We consider the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases