1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 569 N.E.2d
  5. 569 N.E.2d 34 (1991)
 

HOTH v. STOGSDILL

Nos. 2-90-0014, 2-90-0498.

569 N.E.2d 34 (1991)

210 Ill. App.3d 659

155 Ill.Dec. 34

Maureen HOTH, f/k/a Maureen Prondzinski, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William J. STOGSDILL, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1991.

Denial of Rehearing Vacated May 8, 1991.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Whalen (argued), Hedberg, Tobin, Flaherty & Whalen, Chicago, for Maureen Hoth.

James R. Quinn (argued), William F. Martin, Ruff, Weidenaar & Reidy, Ltd., Chicago, for William J. Stogsdill, Jr. and Andrew Carter.

Patrick K. Bond, Schirott & Associates, P.C., Itasca, for Mark Kowalczyk.

Justice UNVERZAGT delivered the opinion of the court:

In this consolidated appeal, plaintiff, Maureen Hoth, formerly known as Maureen Prondzinski, appeals from the orders of the circuit court of Du Page County dismissing her complaint for legal malpractice against defendants, William J. Stogsdill, Jr.; William J. Stogsdill, Jr., P.C., a professional corporation; Kowalczyk and Stogsdill, Ltd., a professional corporation; Andrew Carter and Mark Kowalczyk.

On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases